Web3 alleging an improper denial of benefits under the terms of a plan. 4 Section 502(a)(3) permits participants to obtain relief for violations of ERISA's substantive standards of … WebJan 18, 2024 · DOL argued that: (1) Plaintiffs' claim alleging that the Defendants' imprudence with regard to the company stock fund caused plan losses is a derivative claim on behalf of the plan under ERISA sections 409 and 502(a)(2); (2) given the nature of a section 502(a)(2) claim, purported intra-class conflicts do not defeat a finding under Fed. …
Appropriate” Equitable Relief Under ERISA Section 502(a)(3) – …
WebAug 6, 2024 · University of Southern California that ERISA Section 502(a)(2) claims for breach of fiduciary duty fell outside the scope of the plaintiffs’ individual arbitration agreements because only those individual employees—and not their 403(b) plans—consented to arbitration. The ruling affirmed the district court’s denial of the … WebEquitable remedies for all other breaches of the plan or ERISA itself under Section 502(a)(3). The Court's holding closed a gap in the remedies available in some circuits between so-called "(a)(2)" and "(a)(3)" claims. Some courts held that an "(a)(2)" claim must inure to the plan as a whole, meaning every participant in the plan had to be ... sb \\u0026 sg holdings pty l morwell
Impact of First Impression Equitable Relief ERISA Ruling
WebERISA Section 502 (a) (3) also permits participants, beneficiaries, or fiduciaries to obtain "other appropriate equitable relief" to redress violations of ERISA or a plan, or to enforce … WebIn accordance with the authority of sections 503 and 505 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( ERISA or the Act), 29 U.S.C. 1133, 1135, this section sets forth minimum requirements for employee benefit plan procedures pertaining to claims for benefits by participants and beneficiaries (hereinafter referred to as claimants). WebFiduciary can bring ERISA § 502(a)(3) claim to recover overpayment. But remedies under 502(a)(3) are limited to “appropriate equitable relief.” Mertens v. Hewitt Assoc., 508 U.S. 248 (1993) - The Supreme Court first construed the scope of “appropriate equitable relief,” instructing that Section 502(a)(3) sb \\u0026 ig investments pty ltd